The EuroCrisis – A Cultural Crisis – Part 3: Grexit
Having been
born and raised in Argentina, which underwent a similar situation Greece is
undergoing now in the year 2001, many people ask me if the “Argentinian
solution” could be applicable to Greece. The similarities are many, this is
true:
- A fixed currency: the
Argentinian Peso was pegged to the USD, which restricts flexibility in
monetary policy. A floating currency ensures that, if the exports become
less competitive, a devaluation will lower the salaries and help the
industry.
- Unemployment soured: with a
non-competitive industry and the application of austerity measures,
unemployment soured to 25% (juvenile unemployment reaching 50%).
- Unbearable sovereign debt: like
in the case of Argentina, Greece cannot really make the payments that it
should. A series of rescues simply push the situation forward, but once
again, austerity measures that have pushed the country into depression
ensures that the country does not generate enough surplus to repay the
debt, which becomes even larger as interests accumulate.
The solution for Argentina was to abandon the fixed
currency and devaluate the peso, which boosted the exports, and to default on
the debt, which brought relief to the strangled government’s finances. The
money that was “saved” by not paying the debt was invested in a New Keynesian
plan which increased government expenditure and revitalised the industry.
However, the financial system was destroyed. Even today, in 2016, Argentina is
still fighting to go back to the international capital markets, paying one the
largest interest rates in the world. Development has a roof of course, if there
is no functional financial system. So the solution worked out well in the short
term, but had terrible long term consequences. However, for Argentina, there didn’t
seem to be any choice at that point. The high unemployment rate and half of the
population thrown to poverty led people to the streets and took down the
government in December 2001.
So, what is the solution for Greece? The first
thing is to acknowledge that it’s time in the Eurozone is over. As a matter of
fact, many would argue that Greece should have never entered the Eurozone,
since it inflated it’s fiscal situation in order to show numbers that were
compliant with the metrics provided by the Euro-leaders. But regardless of
that, Greece is just too far away. Bordering Turkey, the Balcans and Bulgaria,
if belongs to the Eastern European bloc. Christian Orthodoxy is the main
religion, from a cultural perspective making it closer to the other Eastern
European countries. So leaving the Eurozone and retaking the dracma as a
currency would be a first step. This would make it’s exports more competitive. About
it’s external debt, defaulting is NOT an option. What the country needs is
re-financing. Fortunately for Greece (this did not happen to Argentina, nobody
cared what happened there), Russia is interested in coming to it’s aid. It is
clear that if it is to bail out Greece, that would mean that the helenic
country should align both politically and economically to Russia. But on a
personal level, I believe that would work out just as fine for Greece. It is
clear that neither the European leaders, nor the European people, ever wanted
Greece in the Eurozone in the first place. Greece, on the minds of Western Europeans,
is just another good place to go on vacation.
But Greece is much more than that. Revolution
4.0 brings about again a world of philosophers, a new age of creators. The
Greek have had a very long and ancient history, and can surely enlighten our path
to a new era of prosperity for humanity. Do not despair people of Greece! Let
go of the chains that tie you to a dead region and show us the path to a new
tomorrow. We, the people of Earth need you!
Your friendly economist,
Cristian “Nash” Bøhnsdalen.
Source:
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario