Comparing
Apples vs. Oranges
Compared to, compared to, let us compare... the
countries!!! In my Releases "Revolution 4.0 and the Man of Tomorrow - Post-Industrialism,
Inequality and the Knowledge Based Economy - Parts 1 & 2", I take you
through the last 200 years of history of the two regions I know the most: South-South
America and Scandinavia, to show you the differences, but also the
similarities. Comparing countries is a difficult thing. Sure, government
processes have played their role, but what about history, culture and religion?
It is very difficult to compare countries in different regions. Let us take the
discussion to a higher level. While the American continent has been mainly
populated by immigrants, Europe has much more history of emigration, war and
colonization. Could be difficult to explain the situation TODAY without knowing
a little bit about the history of these regions.
While Northern Europe has only received migration
waves from other parts of Northern Europe, and Southern Europe was under the
influence of the Roman Empire (a multicultural empire), Argentina was populated
mainly by Europeans, being the 2nd country in the American continent to receive
the most European immigrants after the US. Argentinians naturally tend to
compare themselves with the US, but the United States of America consists of 320
million inhabitants spread in 50 States. Meanwhile, Argentina consists of 23
states housing 43 million inhabitants. Norway, on the other hand, has only 5
million inhabitants and can be compared only to a Province in these countries. There
is no possible comparison.
As explained in my fantastic chapter "Death
and Taxes", tax systems cannot be applied
indiscriminately without having regards for the culture. While Scandinavians
tolerate a heavier tax toll, Southern Europeans prefer a more moderate tax rate
and Southeast Asians do not want to pay taxes at all. Consider that communities
IN those countries will keep their customs and traditions. Meaning the Asians will
still resist paying taxes, even if they live in Europe (or Argentina). The
counterpart of the Tax System is the Welfare System. The more taxes you pay,
the more you get in return: be it healthcare, education, social plans,
whatever. But be careful, too much welfare kills entrepreneurial spirit and
drives laziness. Countries should then look up to models that offer a CULTURAL
match.
Argentina, the most southernmost country in the
World, can look up to both Australia and Canada. From the center South, it could
be said that Argentina is very much like Canada. Consider an average of 25.000
USD x capita for Buenos Aires and the Southernmost provinces compared to 5.000
USD x capita in the North. This responds to lower Productivity from the
Bolivians, Paraguayans and Peruvians, people of Indian origin and their
children also found in Buenos Aires and who live in very bad conditions (they
are Argentina's poor people). Former President Cristina Kirchner referred to
this group as the people "of the original tribes". They are really
3er or 4th generation immigrants from nearby countries that were not
incorporated Productively to the workforce (for whatever reason). I will refer
to this group as "the latinos", a much friendlier term than the
nicknames that they usually get. The solution to poverty in the case of Argentina lies in increasing the Productivity of the latino group. Canada, much further North, does not face this
issue. Australia did have descendents from indigenous people, but not as much. The
US does have a much higher Latino immigration rate, usually coming from Mexico.
My view is that migration at some point happens naturally: no wall or fence
will separate the North of Argentina from Bolivia or Paraguay. As explained in
my chapter "Bolivia: the NeXT India", the most powerful nations in
South America must "help" or make sure that the situation in Bolivia
and Paraguay improves, to resolve their own situation. The impoverishment of
nearby countries eventually hits you, as migration waves naturally flow from
one country to another. This was not understood by Europe, that with austerity
measures strangled Southern European economies dooming itself to the deepest
depression since WW2.
In my article: "Dark Clouds over Norway
and Scandinavian countries", I explain the challenges Scandinavian
countries are going through TODAY. In his masterpiece "Scandinavian
Unexceptionalism: Culture, Markets and the Failure of Third-Way
Socialism", Nima Sanandaji explains that the success of the Nordics little
had to do with the Government. Scandinavians and their descendants abroad show
higher Productivity rates than in Scandinavia itself, were government
intervention and the Welfare system have actually contributed to hinder growth.
This might refer to "the Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of
Capitalism", as described by German Sociologist Max Weber. Consider that
Scandinavian countries have not received migration that is not from Northern
Europe at any point in history, and are as such uni-cultural societies. Social
tensions are arising as the region shifts towards multi-culturalism. From that
view, ALL Scandinavian countries (composing a total population of 20 million
people, excluding Finland), should look to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, a
country with a colonial, multicultural and merchant history consisting of 17 million people.
Consider the case of Spain. Many times Spain
looks up to Germanic countries. Quite clearly, nothing does the multicultural
Kingdom of Spain (Roman Empire influenced), have to do with Northern Europe. Different
religion, colonial history, multiculturalism, the way the country is organized,
the Tax system... Comparisons seem futile. But what is Spain missing, to take
the leap? In my article "How Tech Hubs create Wealth", I explain that
entrepreneurs should be focused in the efforts of Wealth creation leaving the
distribution of that Wealth in the hands of the Government (hopefully in a
transparent manner). Culturally different but with the same Religion and Tax
burden, Spain can look up to Ireland, a country that appears as bridge between
the US and Europe and that the largest Tech giants in the World have chosen to
establish their offices (location matters as well). Once more, the same cannot be said about the Nordics,
which offer a different Tax System and can look to each other for examples in
the Tech Industry (Finland being the most attractive case).
But enough with the countries and comparing!!!
In my article "the 4 Keys of Value Creation", I have given you the
ingredients to change YOUR OWN life and situation. If you live in a Developed Country,
you have all the tools that you need to improve your situation. Don't follow
the Pack, do your own thing, find your niche, succeed, and ENJOY LIFE!!! Better
LUCK NeXT time!!!
SKÅL!!!
Cristian Bøhnsdalen
CMO/CFO and Co-Founder @ITRevolusjonen
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario