jueves, 21 de abril de 2016

Technology in Ancient Civilizations: the Greek




Technology in Ancient Civilizations: 
the Greek

The Minoan Civilization grew up on the island of Crete pre-dated the Greek. In 2600 BC people on Crete were working with bronze and gold. 2000 BC they developed system of writing. And by 1700 – 1450 BC they reached their height and dominated Aegan area. They were seafaring traders, exporting wines, honey and olive oil in Egypt, Asia Minor and Syria. They built magnificent palace at Knossos a small city. By 1450 BC the civilization declined due to earthquake and volcanic that from mainland invaded Crete. The Mycenaean Civilization took it’s place and were the first reminiscent of The Ancient Greek[1] which were surely one of the most influential civilizations in history. Hellenistic civilization spread towards the Middle East with the conquests of Alexander the Great over the Middle East and far into Asia after his death in 323 BC. All in all, the Greek spread from 1700 - 300 BC. They were a seafaring people: they traded with other countries around the Mediterranean. Their cities were founded around the Black Sea, North Africa, Italy, France and Spain. Architecture, philosophy, literature, you name it!!! Poets, Mathematician, Architects, and Philosophers founded a culture that we are still identified with. Ancient Greek philosophy focused on the role of reason and inquiry, and had great implicancies on modern philosophy. The main influencers were Plato and Socrates. They introduced us to many ideas like democracy. The Greek lived in city states, which consisted of a city and it’s surrounding area. These featured some sort of slavery and citizenship was limited to males.
Consider our picture of the Greek: the philosophers. However, in the city of Athens, between 40% and 80% of the population were slaves. Not everyone in Greece could enjoy a life of freedom and full-right citizen, this being more the exception than the norm. Only free, land owning, native-born men could be citizens and were entitled to the full protection of the law. The slaves[2] or duolia were mainly used to work in agriculture or in mines, and were paid for their services. They were not allowed to participate in politics, this being a privilege reserved to the citizens. Education was wide spread, and Greek was a widespread language. Homer wove ancient tales of gods and heroes into epic poetry. Some of his work included the Iliad and Odyssey. The Acropolis was in ancient times the political and religious center of the city. It was where philosophy was debated, and government conducted. Religion occupied a central role in Greek tradition. They prayed to the twelve Olympians, Zeus being their God.
The Greek were the most advanced preindustrial economies in the world. The most common jobs were politicians, generals, secretaries, clerks, accountants, blacksmiths, scientists, carpenters, masons, metalsmiths and shipbuilders. Transportation was carried on by ship and mule. They handled perfumes, copper, ivory, gold, carpet, olive oil, silver, tin, slaves, timber and fish. Large-Scale Farming was not possible. There were city-states because the land was divided by mountains. Greece was not yet unified as a country. Since they were surrounded by water, they created a large naval force. There were many fisherman and they could trade easier with other countries because they were close to the sea.
Their technology was very developed. They were brilliant astronomers, and had discovered that the Earth was round. They used hand-held plows fitted with iron blades, they were pulled by oxen or mules. They used hydraulic cylinders, pumps, machine tools, gears and even some bases of computer sciences: the letters of their messages could be coded in two bits. They loved art, beauty, music theater and poetry. They studied the physical laws that govern music, investigating around and studying harmony. Let us see some example of their technological advances[3]:
  1. Robots: Philo built an automation where birds were singing near an owl, but stopped as soon as the owl periodically turned to them. A robot-servant poured wine first, then water, and stopped when you withdrew your cup. The first vending machine gave the visitor a measure of holy water when he inserted a coin.
  2. Entertainment: automatic theaters were created, with self-opening doors. Stage machinery added special effects like the descent of characters from the sky, scenery changes and movable carts.
  3. Musical instruments: music was a major art. They had organs, wind, string and percussion instruments. Pythagoras and Ptolemy defined the rules of musical harmony, scales and pitches.
  4. Technology in everyday life: they used different types of cranes, pulleys, winches and capstan hoists, block and tackle systems. They had water mills but also used a special type with an horizontal turbine, suited for fast flows of small rivers. As weapons, they invented siege engines throwing arrows (catapults) and balls. The repeater crossbow was the first machine gun! The designed a steam canon, and their siege towers were 9 floors tall. Their heavy merchant ships were turned into fine and fast galleys. To measure time, they devised small portable sundials which could work under 4 different latitudes, or the water clock, which worked as well as an alarm clock.
  5. Technology applied to science: problems were solved by using rulers and compasses, but when this did not work they built devices to seek solutions. The “Antikythera Mechanism” was the first astronomical analog computer in the world. Astronomical observation instruments were created to record the precise position of the stars. The circumference of the Earth was calculated by Eratosthenes with less than 2% error of margin. Hipparchus discovered that the Sun was much larger than the Earth. However, they believed that the planets and the Sun orbited around the Earth, and not the opposite. This was only challenged 1500 years later.
They also built great aqueducts, like the Tunnel of Eupalinos[4]. And Hippocrates[5] is considered the Father of Western Medicine. Ancient Greece can be considered the birth place of Western Civilization. For over 1000 years the Greek devised the most advanced technological feats the world had ever seen. They were also prone to war and conquest. They were thinkers, creators, innovators. In the end, they would be absorbed by the Roman Empire, who built and thrive upon Greek culture. They took their architectural design and creations and built upon them. We will get to that later.

miércoles, 20 de abril de 2016

What is Technology?



What is Technology?

The word Technology[1] was first used by Jacob Bigelow in 1829, to discuss the application of sciences to the useful arts. It can also be defined as “knowledge and skills available to any human society”. Technology is a broad term that refers both to artifacts created by humans, such as machines, and the methods used to create those artifacts. Technology can be used to refer to a way of doing something or a means of organization. Technology is created by humans, tools, machines and appliances: methods of doing something. Humans find problems in life, then they create a solution. As needs change, humans develop and build on old designs. Technology is everything created by humans, and not by nature.  
Technology did not always mean Ipods, DVDs and the Internet. For thousands of years, it was the means by which people secured food and shelter, established social orders, shaped and sustained the cultures. Technology has shaped the way people thought and interacted throughout history, in both a local and national sense. We can consider the appearance of the first signs of technology 50.000 ago, with the use of tools that many archaeologists connect to the emergence of modern languages. The earliest stone tools appeared 40.000 years ago. Fire was controlled by the Homo Erectus about 500.000 years ago. Other technological advances involve clothing and shelter. The New Stone age (known as Neolithic period) includes the invention of stone axes which were used for forest clearing. These lead to the appearance of agriculture as an important change in the lives of people, and an important technological advance. Although agriculture was much more difficult than hunting at first, growing dependence on it allowed ancient societies to build more stable settlements, that could support more people.
The Neolithic Revolution was a means for people to acquire food, which changed the behavior pattern of our cave cultures and better helped them to sustain themselves. By 3000 BC, some groups of Southwestern Indians had already begun to grow corn. The rise of agriculture allowed these people to form permanent settlements. Metal tools replaced the stone, which eventually led to the discovery of bronze and brass (4000 BC). Iron and steel date to 1400 BC.
The Egyptians introduced the first complex technological advances, such as the use of wind power in the sailboat. They also used the flood from the Nile to irrigate their lands. The wheel was invented around 4000 BC, in the Mesopotamia region. The oldest wooden wheel in the world was found in the Ljubljana marshes of Slovenia. The use of the wheel as a transformer of energy (through water wheels, windmills and treadmills) revolutionized the application of nonhuman power sources.
This small introduction leads us to understand that the word “Technology” is misused, or misrepresented. When we think of technology we think mainly about Information Technology. The Internet, Computers, the Iphone, Ipad… You would never imagine the wheel to be technology, but in fact it represented one of the major technological innovations in history!!! NeXT, a recount of historical technological developments will help us understand better the world that we are living in today.
  



miércoles, 13 de abril de 2016

Change Hard: Why Corporations Rise and Fade




The world is changing rapidly. The Fourth Industrial Revolution involves a switch from Big Corporations to a scenery dominated by small business owners. “Change Hard: Why Corporations Rise and Fade” will take you through the last 100 years of Management Theory. With this generic background, it will be easier to understand basic concepts such as Motivation, Leadership, Culture and Team Building in order to succeed in International Business. 
Three examples from real life in Corporations will show you how Directors, Middle Management and Employees will systematically resist change to protect their own interests. Unable to Innovate and lost in their own sea of politics, bureaucracy and inefficiency, few corporations resist the test of time. Entrepreneurs conquer those markets that Corporations fail to capture, introducing Disruptive Innovations that in the end destabilize the Giants themselves. Welcome to the Digital Revolution, the Age of Entrepreneurs!!

Get it HERE:




lunes, 11 de abril de 2016

Productivity vs. Efficiency




Productivity vs. Efficiency

I am constantly surprised by the confusion in the business world between Productivity and Efficiency. So let us take those concepts and explore them.

Productivity[1]: it is simply how much output we produce with a given input. It is regarded as a stimulus response model that an input causes an output. For purposes of simplicity we can say that it is output/input. It is a relationship between resources that come into an organization during a given period of time and outputs generated with those resources. Productivity answers a very simple question: by putting 1 USD of investment in, how many dollars came out?
There could be several ways to measure it. For example: # of customers served per employee, $ sales revenue per sq-ft of store area, etc. One of the most common measures is the ROI (Return on Investment): this measures for every USD of investment how many dollars were returned. The goal is to do more with less, and getting the job done with a smaller budget. Consider the impact on a country level. GDP x capita measures how much output every inhabitant produces on a macroeconomic level. This has absolutely nothing to do with efficiency, or with a company’s situation.
There are many measures that impact productivity: labor productivity, capital/equipment productivity, raw material productivity. Let us take another example. The process Outputs would be the number of bottles produced and sold, whereas Inputs are Labor, Equipment, Raw materials. Let us say that:
Week1: 1000 bottles produced and sold at 20 USD each gives an output of = USD 20,000.
Week2: 1000 bottles produced and sold at 15 USD each gives an output of = USD 15,000.
Output has decreased by 25%; Input has remained the same. Productivity has decreased by 25%.

Efficiency[2]: efficiency is performing in the best possible manner with the least resources, time and efforts. It is about doing things in the right manner, focusing on the processes it is defined as the extent to which time is well used for the intended task. It is a measurable concept, and can be measured in units of: time, effort and cost. It is very easy actually to visualize efficiency. How many sit-ups can you do per minute? How many pages can you read an hour? But most importantly it should be used for work reasons. For example, how many tickets or issues is your team resolving per month? How about individual performances?
Managers should never lose sight of efficiency metrics. But most importantly, never confuse productivity with efficiency. While efficiency focused on producing in a fast manner, productivity focuses on the generation of the value itself. What is efficiency without value added? The input transformed into output, and the relationship between the two, will give you the productivity. But if that input can be produced in an efficient manner, your productivity will actually increase as well. To boost productivity, increase output but also work more efficiently to reduce input.

sábado, 9 de abril de 2016

Innovation is the Key




Innovation is the Key

Everyone speaks about Innovation[1]. Innovation this, innovation that; we are a very innovative company… But what is innovation? Innovation is as simple as taking something existing and transforming it to something that creates new wealth or improves the well-being of society. An innovation can be big or small, brand new or just a little bit different. It all has to start with an idea. It takes 3 steps:
1.       Ideate: an idea is born, and if other people like the idea it goes through.
2.      Create: the idea was experimented with and materialized into usable prototype.
3.     Validate: as more people tested and approved the idea, the more that simple idea then made sense, and money!
Innovation can be Disruptive[2] or Non-disruptive (Sustaining). The concept of Disruptive innovation was introduced in 1990s by Clayton Christensen[3] an American scholar and educator writer of the book The Innovator’s Dilemma. A company follows a path of Sustaining Innovation when it improves it’s products performance based on feedback from it’s best and largest customers. It’s usually about reducing defects and making something faster or more powerful. In contrast, a disruptive innovation often involves lower performance in many of the key features valued by the market. It often means more defects and more speed or power. A disruptive product appears as if it is doing everything wrong. A large company with sophisticated and demanding clients can’t adopt such a technology. Sustaining innovation satisfies a customer’s current needs whereas disruptive technologies and business models evolve to meet customer’s future needs.
Following a Sustaining Innovation path makes a lot more sense in the short term, but it can ultimately doom the company to failure. On the other hand, dedicating valuable resources to a niche and unproven opportunities doesn’t make sense, but can be the future of the company. Disruptive innovation is born from a niche that exists in a market that is neglected by current market offerings. That small market segments cares not about traditional performance features. Large companies need to listen to their customers in order to continue successfully with their sustaining innovations. But they need to look at niche markets and how they use their products in order to identify potentially disruptive innovations and embrace them. This is good news for Start-ups: as long as their innovation has the potential to improve performance rapidly, it’s actually a good thing that their initial market is small. This gives them more time to fine-tune their technology and they don’t need to worry too much about their largest competitors. The only way for giants to fight back is to launch their own disruptive innovation. To succeed, they must treat the project as a separate unit with a different business model and growth expectations. Ask what job the customer needs to get done, segment customers by job and develop low-cost solutions to get the job done.
Think of Disruptive Innovation as a strong shift in an industry. An example is when the computer came along and overtook the typewriter. There was very good electronic typewriter when the computer came out, but nobody thought that computers where going to threaten that industry, since at the beginning computers where so clumsy, nobody even knew what they were going to be used for!! Also, think of analog photography going to digital photography. They are exponential technologies: at the beginning they are deceptive, things are evolving slowly and they are not as good as the existing product offerings. But then they evolve, scale and increase by orders of magnitude, and they all of a sudden become much better than the existing product or services offering. Another very actual example is the Shale Oil Revolution[4] which introduces horizontal drilling as a new technology to reach reservoirs that were already discovered but previously inaccessible. This represents a Disruptive Innovation that changes the whole face of the industry, by increasing the available global reserves to sky limits. By driving down the costs, it has a negative impact on the most expensive oil extraction processes like offshore oil.
Consider though that innovation does not have to be something complex. Any small change can be innovation. A change in the companies’ processes will count as innovation, and as such might encounter resistance. This happens a lot when implementing or upgrading a new software. A change in an accounting software might mean process efficiencies and less working hours for the people in the accounting department. This might mean more free capacity for other tasks, or a reduction in the head count. The Financial Manager himself might resist it. Less people under his command will mean less power in the organization. Not all Managers are in favor of process efficiency and might be only interested in guarding their fortress.
Lean has introduced Business Model Innovation with the Lean Canvas[5]. An organization’s business model can be described with 9 basic building blocks: Customer Segments, Value Proposition, the Channels to each Customers, Customer Relationships, Revenue Streams, Key Resources and activities required to create value, the Key Partners, and the Cost Structure of the business model. These are structured in a Business Model Canvas. It is a tool that helps map, discuss, design and invent new business models. This works for Start-up entrepreneurs just as well as for the most Senior executives.
Entering the Fourth Industrial Revolution, innovation is Key to survival. Big companies must innovate or face extinction. Entrepreneurs must reach those markets that big companies fail to capture. Eventually, they will take the place that those large companies have left empty. A global mindset is absolutely necessary, to capture those business opportunities and rapidly expand them into the target markets. Knowing how to work and collaborate with people from different countries and cultures will become more and more important in a Globalized World.


jueves, 7 de abril de 2016

Kings and Queens




Kings and Queens

Things are different in different countries and different regions. Many times I get asked if I am Norwegian or not. Well, I am. I am also asked if I am Argentinian or not. I am as well. But how can it be? Can you be both? As a matter of fact, you can. Consider the difference between Kingdom and Republic.
Kingdom: Norway, as most northern-european countries, is a Kingdom (and we like it that way, so it’s not going to change). This means there is a Monarchy (Kongehus), and a Royal Family. Norway is a Constitutional monarchy, this means there is a parliament with a Minister of State that is democratically elected for a 4-year period and a fully democratic institutional system. But there is also a historical and long term Royal Family, who is there to protect the interests of the everyday citizen against political interests, assuring equality and freedom for ALL. A constitutional monarch has three main political rights which he could freely exercise: the right to be consulted, the right to advise, and the right to warn. Some constitutional monarchs, however, still retain significant power and influence and play an important political role. This would not be the case of Norway, since the Monarchy does not have seem to have as much influence as it should.


Consider that there were many changes in the Norwegian Royal House since the first King of Norway Harald Fairhair in 872. The lineage changed from Norwegian to Danish to Swedish, to Danish again. King Harald V is the current ruler. He was the son of Olav V and Princess Martha of Sweden. Olav V was the son of Haakon VII; known as Prince Carl of Denmark and Iceland until 1905, he was the elected first king of  Norway after the 1905 dissolution of the union with Sweden. He was a member of the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg.
Now everyone wonders why we pay so many taxes to have a Royal Family, and here is why: they are responsible for aligning the population so that everyone is and feels part of the Kingdom. In a Kingdom, it does not matter where you were born. If you were born abroad, you are still part of the Kingdom, it is your blood-right as Heir to the Kingdom. I would assume though that the people that were born in the Kingdom are part of the Kingdom as well, although this seems as well difficult to understand for some people who enjoy doing “ethnical segregation”.
I am a personal fan of the Norwegian Royal Family. I heard a lot about them being born and raised in Argentina. Instead of buying the People magazine, my Norwegian mother would buy the Hola! (Hello!) magazine from Spain. I would find out all about the Royal houses, mainly from Sweden and Norway, as I joined my mother and grandmother for coffee, cake and waffles. Now that was not your everyday typical “Argentinian” conversations! Not to mention they would switch a lot between Spanish and Norwegian (mixing dialects from East Oslo and Telemark). I also found out about the shock for conservative Norway when current Crown Prince Haakon married Mette-Marit, who already had a child from before. This comes to show you about cultural differences. Whereas in liberal Netherlands King Williem-Alexander married a foreigner, Argentinian Maxima Zorreguieta, in Norway marrying a single mother was a shock in 2001.
Republic: let us take the example of Italy in Europe, so we don’t have to wander so far away (although the same case applies to Argentina, being a Republic as well). In a Republic, if are born in the Republic, you are from there. If you are not born there, you are not from that place. Consider the example from Nouriel Roubini: born in Turkey to Iranian parents, he grew up in Italy but he is not Italian. The children of Italian residing abroad will still get Italian passports via Jus Sanguinis, but they will not be considered Italian in Italy. However, they will not have integration issues. Italians, and Southern Europeans, are much friendlier than Northern-europeans. Consider the case of Spain. Even if it is also a Kingdom, it might be that direct Spanish descendants are not considered Spanish if they move to Spain. This has to do with the influence of the Roman Empire. Most countries in Europe were at some point Kingdoms of course, but the Kingdoms of the South were not as strong as the Kingdoms of the North, since they had a common ruler: The Emperor of Rome. Even if UK and the Netherlands did get Roman influence, it was not as strong or historical. Northern European countries do keep traditional Royal Families even today, which are well connected to each other through bloodlines.
Interesting are the cases of the Netherlands and the UK. These countries have had BOTH Roman AND Germanic influence. As such, they keep the best of Both Worlds. They are different though: UK is more imperialistic and the Netherlands more liberal. They are the most open to migration (as open as it gets, of course), and multiculturalism. As such, they have a better chance of succeeding considering the challenges that lay ahead. Now a half-norwegian, half-argentinian like myself is not really like a polish, as some people would think, since Poland did not have any Roman influence. Having had both Roman and Germanic influence and being a liberal, it is the Netherlands the culture I feel most identified with. Cristian Bøhnsdalen (born and raised in Argentina) of the Kingdom of Norway! (fra Norge!).





lunes, 4 de abril de 2016

Modern Management Theory: Chaos Theory




Modern Management Theory:
Chaos Theory

Edward Lorenz[1] introduced the concept of Chaos Theory[2]. While the military were focused on predicting the weather day to day, using vast computers to do it, Lorenz used an early desk computer to build a simplified model to look at the underlined mathematics to see if the weather had hidden patterns. His model came when he ran the model first with one set of numbers and then again with what he thought were the same numbers but which the computer had rounded off making them minutely different. What he found was that this tiny difference in starting numbers instead of having no effect dramatically changed his results.
One of the main scientific assumptions that were made was that a small area in a large system simply disappears, it has no consequence. Like a small imperfection in a single part in a long assembly line that would make no significant difference to the final outcome. This is the assumption that Lorenz challenged. His accidental discovery had tremendous applications to the real world. He could see that when a system changed, it needn’t be because at that moment something had caused it to changed, it could be that the seeds of it’s destruction had been there and were only growing, hidden in the mathematics all along. The moment the system diverged was the end result of a tiny, unnoticeable change a long time ago. Lorenz called it “the Butterfly effect”. The Linear system assumed that the world is a quiet place were nothing really surprising happens. We will be fine, we just need to know how it works and we can work everything out. Computers allow us to explore things inputting data that previously would have been thrown away, but as it turned out they changed the system all together.
The concept of Butterfly effect[3] is a term used to described how small changes can affect large, complex systems. The term comes from the suggestion that if a Butterfly in Brasil flaps it’s wings, a few weeks later Texas has tornados instead of clear blue skies. It is a reminder of the impact that we have daily. Do we really realize that our behaviors, moves, and actions touch all of the people we come in contact with? Minor actions can create major results. We are all small fractions in the world, but even the smallest actions can create ripples that change the world. 

A good explanation is shown in the movie Jurassic Park:

The Nuclear Age brought with it a tremendous potential of possibilities. There was a peak of optimism towards the potential technology could do in the 1950s, associated with technological development but also cultural that came after the World War II. In the 1950s the future was going to be a planned utopia, of wide boulevards and shining skyscrapers were we would all be happy and prosperous. The computer allowed us to see and control another dimension: the future. With the power of the computer, policy makers thought that they could now predict and control the economy. Governments and corporate films confidently portrayed a future of equilibrium, stability, progress and prosperity. This flawless future was disrupted by the Chaos Theory, which includes unpredictability to modern systems.
Consider the application of the Chaos Theory everywhere. It has been of course proven that the economy cannot be predicted even with the most advanced computational system. Climate and weather changes cannot be predicted either. Human behavior is unpredictable as well, regardless of probabilities and estimations, people are just people and will behave differently. In the information Age, and as we approach go deeper into the 21st century, Chaos Theory is there to remind us that, whatever our accomplishments, we are after all just people.